Mother nature, the ultimate terrorist

Mother nature is in fact and by all possible measure the ultimate
terrorist, with nearly unlimited sleeper cells just waiting to nail
your butt. The 98.5% fluid planetology worth of this Earth, as having
in the past as it will again and again in the future, manage rather
nicely to either traumatise and/or terminate millions of innocent
folks, as well as making life really spendy and/or iffy for those of
us surviving each of her unprovoked attacks.

In addition to all that's humanly contributed, it seems that our
orbiting mascon of 7.35e22 kg hasn't exactly been keeping us cool, or
even less radiated with X-rays and gamma. Something has got to give,
unless Earth w/o ice and w/o magnetosphere is good to go.
- Brad Guth

On Aug 30, 5:05 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mother nature is in fact and by all possible measure the ultimate
> terrorist, with nearly unlimited sleeper cells just waiting to nail
> your butt. The 98.5% fluid planetology worth of this Earth, as having
> in the past as it will again and again in the future, manage rather
> nicely to either traumatise and/or terminate millions of innocent
> folks, as well as making life really spendy and/or iffy for those of
> us surviving each of her unprovoked attacks.
>
> In addition to all that's humanly contributed, it seems that our
> orbiting mascon of 7.35e22 kg hasn't exactly been keeping us cool, or
> even less radiated with X-rays and gamma. Something has got to give,
> unless Earth w/o ice and w/o magnetosphere is good to go.
> - Brad Guth


Sure, that has been occurring since the beginning of earth and it will
not
stop now; indeed it may even accelerate due to man's activity on
earth. I
disagree its the ultimate terrorist. I think a wide scale nuclear
conflagration
around the world would do more to damage the planet. The only other
thing
was big a huge asteroid.

Michael Ragland

On Aug 30, 6:19 pm, raglan...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Aug 30, 5:05 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Mother nature is in fact and by all possible measure the ultimate
> > terrorist, with nearly unlimited sleeper cells just waiting to nail
> > your butt. The 98.5% fluid planetology worth of this Earth, as having
> > in the past as it will again and again in the future, manage rather
> > nicely to either traumatise and/or terminate millions of innocent
> > folks, as well as making life really spendy and/or iffy for those of
> > us surviving each of her unprovoked attacks.
>
> > In addition to all that's humanly contributed, it seems that our
> > orbiting mascon of 7.35e22 kg hasn't exactly been keeping us cool, or
> > even less radiated with X-rays and gamma. Something has got to give,
> > unless Earth w/o ice and w/o magnetosphere is good to go.
> > - BradGuth
>
> Sure, that has been occurring since the beginning of earth and it will
> not stop now; indeed it may even accelerate due to man's activity on
> earth. I disagree its the ultimate terrorist.

You haven't added it all up, have you.

How many folks and other life died off from just the last great flood?
(there were actually quite a good number of recent floods since the
last ice age)

How many folks and other life died off from those horrific geothermal
forces?

>
> I think a wide scale nuclear conflagration around the world
> would do more to damage the planet. The only other thing
> was big a huge asteroid.
>
> Michael Ragland

But since Earth is essentially 98.5% fluid, why leave out our somewhat
recently obtained moon? Doesn't the graviton worth of 2e20 joules per
each and every second account for anything?

Human artificial contributions of even 20 KW per soul is only 134e12
Watts = .262 W/m2 (262 mw/m2), and we are a long ways from that mark
of 20 KW per soul of having contributed such artificial energy into
our environment. However, human soot and our vast amounts of CO2 and
NOx are not exactly helping to keep our atmosphere clear and us cool,
especially with at least 100+ teratonnes of h2o in our polluted
atmosphere to deal with.

Daytime clouds tend to increase Earth's albedo and thereby reflect the
solar energy, while the same as nighttime clouds help retain solar as
well as anything of geothermal and/or humanly contributed. Less ice
means having more clouds by night. Do the math.

BTW, doesn't our moon rate as "a huge asteroid"? (how otherwise did
Earth get at least one of its ocean basins, antipode created mountains
and its seasonal tilt?)
- Brad Guth

Most of us simply haven't added it all up, as we most certainly
haven't bothered to include life other than human (plants and diatoms
being by far the most important).

How many folks and other forms of life died off from just the last
great flood? (there were actually quite a good number of recent floods
since the last ice age, and nearly countless loss of life and property
from the most recent of floods, fire and earthquakes as of just the
last couple thousand years).

How many folks and other life died off from all of those horrific
geothermal forces? (of countless millions or perhaps billions ??? )

I believe we're talking in the realm of hundreds of millions of human
lives taken by various forces of mother nature plus whatever off-world
or cosmic forces, and in many instances of our having to survive total
collateral damage to the point of no return, other than to reconstruct
on top of whatever was once home to us humans, that is if it hadn't
been entirely washed away, buried under volcanic ash and mud or having
sunk entirely out of sight.

It's not that we humans haven't caused our fair share of global trauma
and collateral damage, though in relationship to the raw nature of
such an interactive planetology and the external forces from our sun
and moon are simply by far the most responsible factors, with such
horrific tidal energy going entirely throughout and thereby motivating
each and every cubic meter of this extensively fluid planet (including
its oceans and atmosphere), whereas such graviton force induces a flow
of applied energy which unavoidably begets friction and thereby begets
and/or sustains heat, with by far the greatest influence of such
gravity coming via our physically dark and reactive moon that's so
unusually massive, nearby and on the move in the direction that only
adds to the sun's graviton applied energy of tidal forces.

Here's my deductive SWAG though somewhat dyslexic analogy;
Without our moon, Earth would have roughly a third the ocean tidal
issues to deal with, and by now we'd likely be right back within
another monoseason of an extended ice age like each of those before we
obtained that nifty moon of ours. Relocating that moon out to Earth's
L1 would bring our ocean tidal considerations down to the dull roar of
roughly half of what's currently the case, as well as that daunting
move having introduced a 3~3.5% worth of badly needed solar isolation,
but most importantly having reduced the internal planetology worth of
all that's tidal forced geothermal and thus extra fluid that's only a
very short distance below our mostly dumbfounded two left feet, as
having been causing far more environmental trauma (inside and out)
than necessary.

Therefore getting rid of our moon is not such a good option, but
relocating that horrific mass a little further away is an absolute
solid win-win for the ultimate salvation of all life upon Earth,
that's otherwise going to have to evolve with rad-hard DNA as our
magnetosphere keeps failing us at roughly -.05%/year, whereas
eventually our frail DNA would have to avoid exposure to direct
sunlight as well as moonlight, or even that of an earthshine
illuminated moon. Do the math for yourself, because in the long run
doesn't look good.
- Brad Guth

On 1 Sep, 17:58, BradGuth <bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Most of us simply haven't added it all up, as we most certainly
> haven't bothered to include life other than human (plants and diatoms
> being by far the most important).
>
> How many folks and other forms of life died off from just the last
> great flood? (there were actually quite a good number of recent floods
> since the last ice age, and nearly countless loss of life and property
> from the most recent of floods, fire and earthquakes as of just the
> last couple thousand years).
>
> How many folks and other life died off from all of those horrific
> geothermal forces? (of countless millions or perhaps billions ??? )
>
> I believe we're talking in the realm of hundreds of millions of human
> lives taken by various forces of mother nature plus whatever off-world
> or cosmic forces, and in many instances of our having to survive total
> collateral damage to the point of no return, other than to reconstruct
> on top of whatever was once home to us humans, that is if it hadn't
> been entirely washed away, buried under volcanic ash and mud or having
> sunk entirely out of sight.
>
> It's not that we humans haven't caused our fair share of global trauma
> and collateral damage, though in relationship to the raw nature of
> such an interactive planetology and the external forces from our sun
> and moon are simply by far the most responsible factors, with such
> horrific tidal energy going entirely throughout and thereby motivating
> each and every cubic meter of this extensively fluid planet (including
> its oceans and atmosphere), whereas such graviton force induces a flow
> of applied energy which unavoidably begets friction and thereby begets
> and/or sustains heat, with by far the greatest influence of such
> gravity coming via our physically dark and reactive moon that's so
> unusually massive, nearby and on the move in the direction that only
> adds to the sun's graviton applied energy of tidal forces.
>
> Here's my deductive SWAG though somewhat dyslexic analogy;
> Without our moon, Earth would have roughly a third the ocean tidal
> issues to deal with, and by now we'd likely be right back within
> another monoseason of an extended ice age like each of those before we
> obtained that nifty moon of ours. Relocating that moon out to Earth's
> L1 would bring our ocean tidal considerations down to the dull roar of
> roughly half of what's currently the case, as well as that daunting
> move having introduced a 3~3.5% worth of badly needed solar isolation,
> but most importantly having reduced the internal planetology worth of
> all that's tidal forced geothermal and thus extra fluid that's only a
> very short distance below our mostly dumbfounded two left feet, as
> having been causing far more environmental trauma (inside and out)
> than necessary.
>
> Therefore getting rid of our moon is not such a good option, but
> relocating that horrific mass a little further away is an absolute
> solid win-win for the ultimate salvation of all life upon Earth,
> that's otherwise going to have to evolve with rad-hard DNA as our
> magnetosphere keeps failing us at roughly -.05%/year, whereas
> eventually our frail DNA would have to avoid exposure to direct
> sunlight as well as moonlight, or even that of an earthshine
> illuminated moon. Do the math for yourself, because in the long run
> doesn't look good.
> - Brad Guth

Oh god please don't take you new thesis too serious m8.

The ultimate terrorists is 'western mankinds' attempts to destroy
possibly all life on Earth by burning the place up basically. In fact
'you' could really be best seen a disease, a pathogen, a malign virus,
generated by some evil means... that is scismed from Mother earth
consciousness, unlike the rest of reality. This is the crux: Western
mans scism from real religious/magic/spiritual awareness and reality.
If you dont wake up to this and sort yourselves out, you will be
exterminated.

End of your sad little story western manikin.

On Sep 2, 1:34 am, ecomania <grimus...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 1 Sep, 17:58,BradGuth<bradg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Most of us simply haven't added it all up, as we most certainly
> > haven't bothered to include life other than human (plants and diatoms
> > being by far the most important).
>
> > How many folks and other forms of life died off from just the last
> > great flood? (there were actually quite a good number of recent floods
> > since the last ice age, and nearly countless loss of life and property
> > from the most recent of floods, fire and earthquakes as of just the
> > last couple thousand years).
>
> > How many folks and other life died off from all of those horrific
> > geothermal forces? (of countless millions or perhaps billions ??? )
>
> > I believe we're talking in the realm of hundreds of millions of human
> > lives taken by various forces of mother nature plus whatever off-world
> > or cosmic forces, and in many instances of our having to survive total
> > collateral damage to the point of no return, other than to reconstruct
> > on top of whatever was once home to us humans, that is if it hadn't
> > been entirely washed away, buried under volcanic ash and mud or having
> > sunk entirely out of sight.
>
> > It's not that we humans haven't caused our fair share of global trauma
> > and collateral damage, though in relationship to the raw nature of
> > such an interactive planetology and the external forces from our sun
> > and moon are simply by far the most responsible factors, with such
> > horrific tidal energy going entirely throughout and thereby motivating
> > each and every cubic meter of this extensively fluid planet (including
> > its oceans and atmosphere), whereas such graviton force induces a flow
> > of applied energy which unavoidably begets friction and thereby begets
> > and/or sustains heat, with by far the greatest influence of such
> > gravity coming via our physically dark and reactive moon that's so
> > unusually massive, nearby and on the move in the direction that only
> > adds to the sun's graviton applied energy of tidal forces.
>
> > Here's my deductive SWAG though somewhat dyslexic analogy;
> > Without our moon, Earth would have roughly a third the ocean tidal
> > issues to deal with, and by now we'd likely be right back within
> > another monoseason of an extended ice age like each of those before we
> > obtained that nifty moon of ours. Relocating that moon out to Earth's
> > L1 would bring our ocean tidal considerations down to the dull roar of
> > roughly half of what's currently the case, as well as that daunting
> > move having introduced a 3~3.5% worth of badly needed solar isolation,
> > but most importantly having reduced the internal planetology worth of
> > all that's tidal forced geothermal and thus extra fluid that's only a
> > very short distance below our mostly dumbfounded two left feet, as
> > having been causing far more environmental trauma (inside and out)
> > than necessary.
>
> > Therefore getting rid of our moon is not such a good option, but
> > relocating that horrific mass a little further away is an absolute
> > solid win-win for the ultimate salvation of all life upon Earth,
> > that's otherwise going to have to evolve with rad-hard DNA as our
> > magnetosphere keeps failing us at roughly -.05%/year, whereas
> > eventually our frail DNA would have to avoid exposure to direct
> > sunlight as well as moonlight, or even that of an earthshine
> > illuminated moon. Do the math for yourself, because in the long run
> > doesn't look good.
> > - Brad Guth
>
> Oh god please don't take you new thesis too serious m8.
>
> The ultimate terrorists is 'western mankinds' attempts to destroy
> possibly all life on Earth by burning the place up basically. In fact
> 'you' could really be best seen a disease, a pathogen, a malign virus,
> generated by some evil means... that is scismed from Mother earth
> consciousness, unlike the rest of reality. This is the crux: Western
> mans scism from real religious/magic/spiritual awareness and reality.
> If you dont wake up to this and sort yourselves out, you will be
> exterminated.
>
> End of your sad little story western manikin.

"seen as a disease, a pathogen, a malign virus, generated by some evil
means" is the Yid's America in a nut shell. Get used to it, or die on
another cross if need be.

I agree that as of lately, western humanity has put a few more than
our fair shair of rusty old nails in our coffin, as having somewhat
recently plundered, pillaged and *removed**removed**removed**removed*d mother Earth for all she's
worth, and then some. None the less, nature can and has in somewhat
recent times taken far more responsibility for the global collateral
damage and carnage of all forms of life on Earth, not that our modern
western humanity isn't trying to out do mother nature.

I cite the laws of physics. CO2, much like radon gas, is heavy.

If we release another local megatonne worth of raw CO2, as such we
local research fools here on the surface will likely die, whereas up
in them acidic clouds there's much less CO2 but otherwise loads of
NOx, and above them polluted clouds there's hardly any of that surface
released CO2 to behold, but there's still loads of sooty NOx to
behold.

Humanly sooty NOx is potentially a much greater problem than our sooty
CO2, although the global dimming as directly caused by our soot
saturated CO2 and NOx are in fact measurable factors of AGW, whereas a
mere 1% reduction in global albedo is going to provide a 0.5% increase
in the solar IR energy influx.

I believe our global albedo has fallen off by a good 10% over the past
thousand years, and perhaps more like having lost 25% since the last
ice age. With some additional research, those albedo numbers can
become polished in order to show exactly what the soot of humanity has
accomplished, as opposed to what the normal planetology with moon has
accomplished since the very last ice age this planet w/moon will ever
see (with or w/o humanity).

I'm still looking for the hard/objective science that should exist.
However, in the mean time, albedo feedback in a thermal dynamic loop
is perhaps the most telling of how much AGW can be contributed to the
human soot and our surface modifications, as opposed to the natural
planetology w/moon of having been thawing us out ever since the last
ice age this planet with or w/o humanity will ever see.

Too bad we still do not have that array of science instruments parked
within our moon's L1, at not more than 1% the NASA/Apollo fiasco
investment, whereas the moon's L1 platform of such science instruments
would have been very telling of what our sun, the moon and Earth have
in common with the kind of global warming taking place ever since the
last ice age.

Of course, this is also where a given supercomputer and physics
simulator on behalf of planetology research could have run off a good
number of what-if ice ages and subsequent thaws. For some odd reason,
all such public paid for supercomputers and of their spendy simulator
software are still taboo/nondisclosure rated. Perhaps the
supercomputers and physics simulator software of other than American
resources can come to our scientific/research rescue before it's too
late.
- Brad Guth -

As long as mainstream religions have us firmly by our private parts,
there's little if any hope no matters how smart you are. There's only
so much that smart leadership and/or the best of technology can mange
to pull off when the puppeteers in charge are using tougher strings
connected to those tasers.

Banishment and continued naysayism imposed via Usenet is one thing,
but official news topic/author banishment and/or the likes of book
burning by the almighty command of mainstream media is quite another
facet to that warm and fuzzy gem of whatever Yids think is best.

Even our local KSTW(channel 11) "The Daily Buzz" news program has been
recently terminated because they are not nearly Yiddish enough, or in
other words The Daily Buzz simply wasn't being enough of a status quo
team player. Go figure, as to why there's all the sudden news media
blackout/banishment pertaining to "The Daily Buzz" programming having
been terminated?

Apparently being the least bit anti-Bush is yet another media no-no,
as well as for suggesting that mainstream religions are either
orchestrating and/or allowing this horrific fiasco of global warming
and that nasty hocus-pocus war of global energy domination via their
puppets from the very get go. Perhaps it's a darn good thing that
Americans are so easily snookered and subsequently so totally
dumbfounded past the point of no return, in that they don't even read
those independently formulated and informative publications of "Mother
Earth", "Mother Jones" or of anything similar.
- Brad Guth -

Question(s) of the day:
Our butts are being kicked by the sleeper cell called mother nature,
so what's not perfectly rational about our fully utilizing or moon and
of its L1 for all it's worth? or for that matter of relocating that
entire moon out to Earth's L1?

Here's a irrefutable fact: our moon is simply not as robust nor as
solid to its salty core as you and your NASA/Apollo suck-ups would
like to think. Somewhat unrelated (meaning off-topic), this is what
I've recently contributed to another lost soul of Usenet that I'm sure
you'd just as soon topic/author stock, bash and/or simply apply as
much banishment as you could muster.

Willie Moo's space based IR laser cannons and terrestrial IR PV
receiving stations by the dozens: "Solar powered lasers in space" and
hundreds of spendy terrestrial receiving stations that are each +/-
100 meters off-limits to all forms of life as we know it, but at least
we'd have yet another clean resource of energy for producing h2o2 and
processing raw earth into aluminum or whatever else make you a happy
camper.

Here's a fifth gold star for his topic (*****)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...a2613fd22d46f1
As per usual it looks perfectly great, except having excluded the
usual ENRON/Exxon 10X factor, making that potential of "0.03 cents per
kWh" into at least a wholesale worth of $0.30 per kWh (end user at
perhaps $0.50/kwhr), but lo and behold at least it's clean and
renewable, as well as usable for many other life and Earth saving
things, like burning a nice hole through our resident warlord's butt.

Have you figured out which significant group of topic/author stocking
naysayers is in charge of your private parts, and subsequently as to
why your research and best of intentions are not getting Usenet or any
other group net supported?

Too bad that I'm not in charge, as your space based laser cannon
energy as well as those nifty terrestrial applications of solar
extracted energy would have been 50/50 public funded as of a dacade
ago, including those subsequent terrestrial applications of converting
solar energy directly into wussy hydrogen or good old robust h2o2.

BTW, even if ISS were donated and 100% converted into a viable
platform of hosting those IR laser cannons, and outfitted along with
those multiple km2 solar collectors, it wouldn't become nearly as
affordable as you've suggested, as for the cost and extremely negative
environmental impact of keeping such technology up and running isn't
cheap, nor without human risk, not to mention each of those off-limit
terrestrial receiving stations and of the laser knife of air space in
between.

As my having offered before, I have a perfectly viable fix or two for
that, which includes utilizing our moon's L1 and a tether dipole
element that'll give your laser cannons access to 97.6% of direct
solar and loads of other than solar renewable energy to boot (I'm
talking multiple teraWatts of continuous clean energy).

However, if a certain little faith-based group were trying to dominate
Earth for all it's worth, why would they allow or much less fund
public access to your clean and affordable energy, and especially if
it were renewable?

You do realize that our corrupt government that's faith-based
puppeteered and in total denial of their being in denial, will soon
enough require us to pay $1/kwhr, don't you?

Clue No.1) those that are currently rich and powerful don't actually
give a tinkers damn as to how spendy, polluting or lethal our energy
can be made, because where do you think they obtain their loot that's
stuffed into those nifty offshore/(tax avoidance) bank accounts, as
is.

Until you folks realize whom is in charge of your private parts, and
subsequently of how badly snookered you've been, there's no way in any
hell on Earth that anything 'Willie Moo' is ever going to fly.

BTW, do you even realize what number of our homes are 50% or more
heated with the likes of wood, corn and even coal, because they simply
can't afford their local energy grid or other alternatives as is?

Of course, thanks to our corrupt government, many have lost or are in
the process of losing their homes and are soon enough if not already
living on the streets, or if lucky they live in some god forsaken dump
of a place with minimal or w/o energy. The American system has badly
failed to take care of its own kind from the bottom up (meaning honest
education), and there's simply not the resources available as long as
those Cheney/ENRON/Exxon types and of their faith-based puppeteers are
in charge. But then you and others of your pathetic kind don't think
there's any such problems to begin with, and therefore history needn't
be revised.
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
- Brad Guth -

Global Terrorism Question(s) of the day:
Our butts are being kicked about by that extremely nasty sleeper cell
called mother nature, so what's not perfectly rational about our fully
utilizing or moon and of its L1 for all it's worth? or for that
matter of relocating that entire global warming moon out to Earth's L1
where it'll at least start paying its own way.

Here's a irrefutable fact: our moon is simply not nearly as robust nor
as solid to its salty core, or nearly as passive to cosmic and solar
energy as you and your NASA/Apollo suck-ups would like to think.
Somewhat unrelated (meaning off-topic), this is what I've recently
contributed to another lost soul of Usenet that I'm sure you'd just as
soon topic/author stock, bash and/or simply apply as much banishment
as you and those of your swarm can muster.

Willie Moo's space based IR laser cannons and terrestrial IR PV
receiving stations by the dozens: "Solar powered lasers in space" and
hundreds of those spendy terrestrial receiving stations that are each
+/- 100 meters off-limits to all forms of life as we know it, but at
least we'd have yet another clean resource of energy for producing
h2o2 and processing raw earth into aluminum or whatever else makes you
a happy camper.

Here's a fifth gold star for his topic (*****)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...a2613fd22d46f1
As per usual it looks perfectly great, except for his having excluded
the usual ENRON/Exxon 10X markup factor, making that potential of "03
cents per kWh" into at least a wholesale worth of $0.30 per kWh (end
user at perhaps $0.50/kwhr), but lo and behold at least it's clean and
renewable, as well as directly usable for many other life and Earth
saving things, like burning a nice hole through our resident warlord's
butt and those deserving butts of his possy.

Have you figured out which significant group of topic/author stocking
naysayers is in charge of your private parts, and subsequently as to
why your research and best of intentions are not getting Usenet or any
other group net supported?

Too bad that I'm not in charge, as your space based laser cannon
energy as well as those nifty terrestrial applications of solar
extracted energy would have been 50/50 public funded as of a dacade
ago, including those subsequent terrestrial applications of converting
solar energy directly into wussy hydrogen or good old robust h2o2.

BTW, even if ISS were donated and 100% converted into a viable
platform of hosting those IR laser cannons, and outfitted along with
those multiple km2 solar collectors, it wouldn't become nearly as
affordable as you've suggested, as for the cost and extremely negative
environmental impact of keeping such technology up and running isn't
cheap, nor without human risk, not to mention each of those off-limit
terrestrial receiving stations and of the laser knife of air space in
between.

As my having offered before, I have a perfectly viable fix or two for
that, which includes utilizing our moon's L1 and a tether dipole
element that'll give your laser cannons access to 97.6% of direct
solar and loads of other than solar renewable energy to boot (I'm
talking multiple teraWatts of continuous clean energy).

However, if a certain little faith-based group were trying to dominate
Earth for all it's worth, why would they allow or much less fund
public access to your clean and affordable energy, and especially if
it were renewable?

You do realize that our corrupt government that's faith-based
puppeteered and in total denial of their being in denial, will soon
enough require us to pay $1/kwhr, don't you?

Clue No.1) those that are currently rich and powerful don't actually
give a tinkers damn as to how spendy, polluting or lethal our energy
can be made, because where do you think they obtain their loot that's
stuffed into those nifty offshore/(tax avoidance) bank accounts, as
is.

Until you folks realize whom is in charge of your private parts, and
subsequently of how badly snookered you've been, there's no way in any
hell on Earth that anything 'Willie Moo' is ever going to fly.

BTW, do you even realize what number of our homes are 50% or more
heated with the likes of wood, corn and even coal, because they simply
can't afford their local energy grid or other alternatives as is?

Of course, thanks to our corrupt government, many have lost or are in
the process of losing their homes and are soon enough if not already
living on the streets, or if lucky they live in some god forsaken dump
of a place with minimal or w/o energy. The American system has badly
failed to take care of its own kind from the bottom up (meaning honest
education), and there's simply not the resources available for the
likes of Willie Moo as long as those Cheney/ENRON/Exxon types and of
their faith-based puppeteers are in charge. But then you and others
of your pathetic kind don't think there's any such past or current
problems to begin with, and therefore history needn't be revised.
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
- Brad Guth -