Re: To the Rest of the World: **BEWARE** of the USA. It is NOTyour friend. Not any more!!

Rob Duncan wrote:

> Youre a complete moron. Proof to follow.

That's agreat start for getting at the truth.

>
> "light" <light@darkness.org> wrote in message
> news:110uiksqc9f1sa5@corp.supernews.com...
>
>>alan truelove wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>a comparatively tiny nation that was posing NO threat to its neighbors
>>>>(nor had done
>>>>so for more than a decade)
>>>
>>>--
>>>any Nation that doesnt 100% cooperate with Consortium inspection is a
>>>threat; all it takes is 1 little nuke in my back yard.
>>>No one had previously crashed a jet into a tall building and caused it
>>>to collapse.. so what?
>>>Wogs, sand-niggers, chinks, gooks, slants of all stripes better
>>>scurry.
>>
>>Strange how you have to demonise and denigrate people before you can face
>>yourselves 'morally' to justify what the UN has declared 'illegal
>>aggression'.
>
>
> A lie. Typical tactic of Morons.

So how do you justify 'Wogs, sand-niggers, chinks, gooks,' and he forgot
'rag-heads' - your (US) latest demonisation of fellow human beings?

>
>
>>>Or it's back to the stone age.
>>>The US is the friend of rule-of-law and decent countries the world
>>>over, Bush did precisely the right thing at the right time. Be
>>>thankful.
>>
>>Rule of Law? How do you equate that with never ending attempts by the GOP
>>US admin to destroy democracy by any means possible in country after
>>country. E.g. Venezuela, right now, where the president has withstood your
>>attacks 6 times now and each time been voted for by a *majority* (ya
>>know - the basis of democracy)?
>
>
> He hasnt withstood a single attack by us. If we so chose we could eliminate
> him and his government in one day.

That's rich considering how he totally outwitted you in 2002...

> That you think were in the business of
> destroying democracies, you might be right, when theyre corrupted to the
> point where they infringe upon the electretes freedoms. Under those
> circumstances, we do, and have always, succesfully, destroyed such regimes.

You can bury your head in the sand if it suits you but it doesn't alter
the facts. NED money, Carmona the US stooge, Otto Reich, one time
Secretary of State for Latin America - heck, even your very own
Stratfor.com admitted it!!

>
> His whinning is simply political bluster. Propaganda. As if those now
> under his rule want to live in a communist fascist state.

Dear me! You really can't have it both ways, old chap! ;-)

> Not. As always,
> well give him time to hang himself. Which "will" happen. It usually does
> in South American countries.

So helping millions of poor to help themselves doesn't figure? So long
as you get their oil, it doesn't matter a damn to you what happens to
the locals?

>
>
>>I don't think americans-for-bush know the meaning of the word democracy
>>any more.
>
>
> What? The liberal socialist NEA failed in indocrinating our youth properly?
> Ill choose to disagree. I think theyve done a fine job of creating a
> babbling mess of idiots that now populate our universities. Just what do
> you think "democracy" means? Do you even know?

Yes, very clearly - one person, one vote - all have a say - not exactly
in line with your Patriot Act is it?


>>And certainly have no idea of the true meaning of the rule of law - why
>>else put someone like Gonzales to 'rule over you'?
>
>
> More proof for the initial conclusion. Hes a well respected judge. He
> knows the law, and lives by it, far better than you can ever dream of.

Condones torture - very nice...

> Nobody can "rule over us"; only us. And just us. Nobody else.

Guess you haven't fallen foul of your goonsquad yet then?

>> Why else try to weasel out of the Geneva conventions,
>
>
> Name who was covered under the Geneva convention that wasnt treated properly
> under the rules of the Geneva Convention. Just one name. Come on, give it
> a try.

Oh do give over! Rewrite history if you want, but Abu Ghraib and Gitmo
are not going to go away...

>
>
>>the International Criminal Court and every other 'rule of law' fought for
>>by decent people the world over?
>>
>>l
>
>
> Theres no such thing as the "International Criminal Court." Just because
> somebody wants to name their organization in a way that makes it sound cool,
> doesnt legitize or empower it in any way.

So the fact that it has been ratified by 70 countries just doesn't
figure? The fact that it is in session now doesn't figure?

>
> I could create an agency called the "Socialist Investigative and Punishment
> Division." Doing so doesnt validate it as a legitimate tool in hunting down
> twits like you.

Ad hominem attacks usually indicate that the attacker has not looked in
a mirror recently and that most likely, his/her heartfelt beliefs are
becoming subject to cognitive dissonance. They're poor grounds for
communication - something Americans-for-Bush seem to have given up on
entirely.

I am truly sorry for your nation when you can be hoodwinked so very
easily by lies repeated ad nauseum even in this age of mass
communictions and global knowledge bases.

May I respectfully recommend that you broaden the scope of your
'researches' and desist from knee-jerk reactions to the truth, ghastly
as it seems?

l