Re: Now Ken calls Nicki Gavron a '*removed**removed**removed**removed*'

On the 16 Feb 2005 02:44:42 -0800, whilst Caruthers was creaming the
Maids Muffin, (much to her great delight), this jewell arived from
theovermind@another.com (jackkincaid) not wishing to put Caruthers of
his stroke I decided to deal with it:

>"steeler" <nospam@nomail.com> wrote in message news:<421293b7$0$19162$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>...
>
>> Can you stop starting new threads.
>
>No I can't, at least not all the time. My google account isn't working
>properly on one of my PCs.
>
>> Keep it all in the existing one and anyone interested can find it there.
>
>If you're not interested, friend, don't read it.

Well put

"Mick" <mick007-1@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:knq611l6jnine5feorngib2e86lgq98pr4@4ax.com...
> On the 16 Feb 2005 02:44:42 -0800, whilst Caruthers was creaming the
> Maids Muffin, (much to her great delight), this jewell arived from
> theovermind@another.com (jackkincaid) not wishing to put Caruthers of
> his stroke I decided to deal with it:
>
> >"steeler" <nospam@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:<421293b7$0$19162$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>...
> >
> >> Can you stop starting new threads.
> >
> >No I can't, at least not all the time. My google account isn't working
> >properly on one of my PCs.
> >
> >> Keep it all in the existing one and anyone interested can find it
there.
> >
> >If you're not interested, friend, don't read it.
>
> Well put

Not really. I wasn't having a go but it is OT and putting it all under one
thread would cause a lot less clutter. Still compares to Mullen I guess it
only mildly annoying.

"Mick" <mick007-1@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:knq611l6jnine5feorngib2e86lgq98pr4@4ax.com...
> On the 16 Feb 2005 02:44:42 -0800, whilst Caruthers was creaming the
> Maids Muffin, (much to her great delight), this jewell arived from
> theovermind@another.com (jackkincaid) not wishing to put Caruthers of
> his stroke I decided to deal with it:
>
> >"steeler" <nospam@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:<421293b7$0$19162$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>...
> >
> >> Can you stop starting new threads.
> >
> >No I can't, at least not all the time. My google account isn't working
> >properly on one of my PCs.
> >
> >> Keep it all in the existing one and anyone interested can find it
there.
> >
> >If you're not interested, friend, don't read it.
>
> Well put

Not really. I wasn't having a go but it is OT and putting it all under one
thread would cause a lot less clutter. Still compares to Mullen I guess it
only mildly annoying.

"Mick" <mick007-1@onetel.net.uk> wrote in message
news:knq611l6jnine5feorngib2e86lgq98pr4@4ax.com...
> On the 16 Feb 2005 02:44:42 -0800, whilst Caruthers was creaming the
> Maids Muffin, (much to her great delight), this jewell arived from
> theovermind@another.com (jackkincaid) not wishing to put Caruthers of
> his stroke I decided to deal with it:
>
> >"steeler" <nospam@nomail.com> wrote in message
news:<421293b7$0$19162$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>...
> >
> >> Can you stop starting new threads.
> >
> >No I can't, at least not all the time. My google account isn't working
> >properly on one of my PCs.
> >
> >> Keep it all in the existing one and anyone interested can find it
there.
> >
> >If you're not interested, friend, don't read it.
>
> Well put

Not really. I wasn't having a go but it is OT and putting it all under one
thread would cause a lot less clutter. Still compares to Mullen I guess it
only mildly annoying.